Hashcats minting slowdown threatens HASH token deflationary model

Editorial illustration: A metal press stamps purple cat-shaped tokens beside a nearly empty conveyor leading toward a shredder. A purple cat token sits in its hopper, with a few fragments in the tray below.

In brief

  • Hashcats recorded 4,566 mints in epoch 10, falling short of 16,376-cat target.
  • Minting slowdown reduces ETH flowing into the buyback mechanism purchasing HASH tokens.
  • Buyback has burned 1.8 million HASH (41.3% of supply) using 194.6 ETH.
  • Entry price doubled to 0.164 ETH, halving user mining participation.

Minting pace collapses under doubled entry cost

Hashcats recorded 4,566 mints in recent days, well below the project's 16,376-cat target for the epoch. The project has mined 9,109 cats so far, roughly 55% of the way to its goal. The timing is critical—the entry price for epoch 10 sits at roughly 0.164 ETH, double what it cost in the previous epoch.

That price spike appears to be the culprit. The doubling of entry cost has more than halved user enthusiasm for mining. Fewer miners mean fewer cats minted, and fewer mints mean less ETH flowing into the buyback mechanism that props up the HASH token's deflationary model.

Buyback engine running on fumes

The math is straightforward. Thirty percent of mint proceeds feed into a buyback mechanism that purchases and burns HASH tokens. Additionally, 5% of swap fees on the token do the same. Combined, this mechanism has done serious work—the buyback has burned 1.8 million HASH tokens, wiping out 41.3% of total issuance using approximately 194.6 ETH.

But momentum is slowing. Approximately 29 ETH currently sits in the buyback queue waiting to be deployed. That buffer can continue reducing HASH supply even if mining stops entirely, yet it's a finite cushion. The question isn't whether the buyback works—it's whether it can sustain meaningful pressure on supply when minting velocity collapses.

The sustainability test

With HASH trading around 0.0001275 ETH, the token sits far below the price required to make epoch 10 entry attractive to new miners. Trading of HASH began around September 11, 2026, shortly after the 1,016th cat was minted, and the project has now burned 1,698 cats, creating additional scarcity on the NFT side.

The core tension is unavoidable. Raising epoch entry prices to increase buyback pressure backfires when it kills participation. Lower participation means lower buyback funding, which means weaker price support, which makes entry even less attractive. The project now faces a choice: lower prices to reignite mining activity, or accept that the deflationary mechanism may have peaked.

"Minting activity has dropped significantly as the project enters its tenth epoch, and that slowdown is pulling the rug out from under the buyback mechanism designed to prop up the $HASH token."

The remaining 7,267 cats represent the test ahead. Whether they get minted at a meaningful pace will determine whether Hashcats' deflationary model survives its first real stress test.