Crypto VC Firms Plummet to 150, Lowest Since November 2020

Editorial illustration for: Crypto VC firms plummet to 150, lowest level since November 2020

In brief

  • Only 150 unique VC firms participated in crypto funding through July 28, lowest since November 2020
  • Deal activity declined 87% from May 2022 peak of 1,177 unique crypto investors
  • Regulatory tightening, reduced trading volumes, and higher interest rates drove the pullback

The scale of the collapse

The number of unique venture firms participating in crypto deals has collapsed 87% from the 2022 peak, when 1,177 investors were piling into crypto deals. The shrinkage extends beyond just deal count. In the first quarter of 2026, approximately $4 billion was deployed across 355 deals, representing a roughly 50% drop quarter-over-quarter.

The pullback signals a fundamental shift in how capital flows through the crypto ecosystem. It's not just fewer deals — it's fewer people willing to make them.

Concentration and market structure

Coinbase Ventures has historically led the pack with over 372 tracked deals, making it the most prolific investor in the space by sheer volume. When a small number of firms dominate deal flow, their investment theses effectively shape which sectors receive capital. The result concentrates power among established players while making it harder for new entrants to raise capital.

Why VCs are stepping back

Regulatory tightening across major markets made crypto investing riskier from a compliance perspective. The enforcement-heavy posture adopted by regulators in the US and elsewhere created uncertainty that institutional-grade VCs did not want to navigate.

Market mechanics also played a role. Reduced trading volumes across both centralized and decentralized exchanges mean lower trading fees, which in turn makes the revenue models underpinning many crypto startups look less attractive to potential backers. Higher interest rates through much of the past few years gave traditional asset allocators reasons to park money in safer vehicles.

The combination of regulatory headwinds, lower market volumes, and better returns elsewhere has created a vicious cycle. Fewer investors participate. Less capital deploys. Fewer startups get funded. Innovation slows.